Церковь Иисуса Христа Святых Последних дней

Свернуть
X
 
  • Время
  • Показать
Очистить всё
новые сообщения
  • Evacska
    Участник

    • 27 November 2005
    • 312

    #1306
    Сообщение от Evacska
    http://www.bookofabraham.info/VideoClips.htm здесь клип о том, как Джозеф Смит переводил книгу Абрахама (английский)
    http://www.lhvm.org/arch/bband.htm а здесь о КМ и Библии
    IGNORANCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY OPPRESSION.
    IT ONLY MAKES IT POSSIBLE.
    Patricia Evans Controlling People

    Комментарий

    • Nikol
      Участник

      • 29 December 2005
      • 400

      #1307
      Сообщение от Evacska
      http://www.lhvm.org/arch/bband.htm а здесь о КМ и Библии
      А я нашла Книгу Мормона. Но прочитала совсем немного, так как пока нет достаточно времени. Но и то, что прочитала, подтвердило мои предположения. Отдельные цитаты из Библии, написанные несколько другим языком и, разумеется с искаженным смыслом. Позже, когда буду свободнее-смогу привести много примеров, чтобы не говорили, что я,
      мягко говоря, обманываю.
      Но твоей ссылкой воспользуюсь обязательно. Спасибо!

      Комментарий

      • Evacska
        Участник

        • 27 November 2005
        • 312

        #1308
        Сообщение от Nikol
        А я нашла Книгу Мормона. Но прочитала совсем немного, так как пока нет достаточно времени. Но и то, что прочитала, подтвердило мои предположения. Отдельные цитаты из Библии, написанные несколько другим языком и, разумеется с искаженным смыслом. Позже, когда буду свободнее-смогу привести много примеров, чтобы не говорили, что я,
        мягко говоря, обманываю.
        Но твоей ссылкой воспользуюсь обязательно. Спасибо!

        Еще не плохой клип:


        IGNORANCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY OPPRESSION.
        IT ONLY MAKES IT POSSIBLE.
        Patricia Evans Controlling People

        Комментарий

        • Evacska
          Участник

          • 27 November 2005
          • 312

          #1309
          Сообщение от Evacska


          А это аудио файлы. Интервью с разными людьми (английский)
          IGNORANCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY OPPRESSION.
          IT ONLY MAKES IT POSSIBLE.
          Patricia Evans Controlling People

          Комментарий

          • Nikol
            Участник

            • 29 December 2005
            • 400

            #1310
            Сообщение от Evacska
            Николь, все это находится в официальных мормонских документах. Много чего до сих пор можно найти, и не представит труда для интересующихся. Например в Университетских библиотеках, в сети мормонских магазинов "Дезерет" и читая Мормонскую историю, тоже можно найти много чего. Кроме того сейчас выходит много книг например "Under Bunner of Heaven" книга основанная на реальной истории, как этот закон "Искупления кровью" применялся на практике не в очень давней истории. Кроме того интернет заполнен информацией, нужно только уметь отделять правду от лжи. Люди, которые серьезно изучают, опираются на фактические документы и события.
            Все, что касается сегодняшних дней, Мормоны будут говорить тебе, что они этого не делают, не практикуют полигамию и т.д. Но официальная церковь просто прекратила делать это, но не приносила извинения, ни вдавалась в объяснения. Но Пророки, которые получали подобные откровения от Бога, до сих пор в списке Пророков, высоко чтятся и изучаются на церковных уроках. Как результат, эти идеи все еще в умах некоторых сильно промытых и как результат - в США около 75 тысяч полигамистов - результат этой политики. А что они там вытворяют внутри сообщества, кто знает...
            Cодом и Гоморра. По-видимому и закончат так же...
            Жаль тех, кто обманут, жаль исковерканные жизни, ведь все-равно
            когда-то прийдет понимание, если не станут фанатиками!

            Комментарий

            • vladimir1
              Участник

              • 19 September 2004
              • 262

              #1311

              ..........
              Последний раз редактировалось vladimir1; 06 February 2006, 06:13 PM.

              Комментарий

              • vladimir1
                Участник

                • 19 September 2004
                • 262

                #1312
                [quote=Evacska]
                Сообщение от vladimir1
                И все-таки, Evacska, когда у вас будет время, добавьте еще что-нибудь к теме искупления кровью.
                Сообщение от vladimir1
                Очень интересно читать эти высказывания.
                Твердые, сильные, бескомпромисные.
                Только с преводом, уж пожалуйста, покорректнее.
                Ага?[/quote)

                THIS IS LOVING OUR NEIGHBOR AS OURSELVES; if he needs help, help him; and if he wants salvation and it is NECESSARY TO SPILL HIS BLOOD on the earth in order that he may be saved, SPILL IT. Any of you who understand the principles of eternity, if you have sinned a sin REQUIRING THE SHEDDING OF BLOOD, except the sin unto death, would not be satisfied nor rest until your blood SHOULD BE SPILLED, that you might gain that salvation you desire. THAT IS THE WAY TO LOVE MANKIND. (Sermon by Brigham Young, delivered in the Mormon Tabernacle, Feb. 8, 1857, printed in the Deseret News, Feb. 18, 1857; also reprinted in the Journal of Discourses, Vol. 4, pp. 219-220)


                Evacska, я нашел в нете полную статью Бригама Янга. Та цитата, что вы приводили, отсюда.
                Рекомендую вам ее прочитать полностью. Статью, конечно.
                По прочтению всего выступления Бригама Янга смысл этой цитаты серъезно меняется.
                Evacska, вы уж, пожалуйста, если приводите цитаты, то давайте источник. Либо полную статью, либо адрес.
                А то не солидно выглядит.
                Вопросов много возникает и к автору и к вам.

                To Know God is Eternal LifeGod the Father of Our Spirits and BodiesThings Created Spiritually FirstAtonement By the Shedding of Blood
                A Discourse by President Brigham Young, Delivered in the Tabernacle, Great Salt Lake City, February 8, 1857.

                I feel myself somewhat under obligations to come here and talk to the people, inasmuch as I have absented myself for some time, and others have occupied this stand.
                Perhaps I will not talk to you long, but I desire to pursue some of the ideas that brother Cummings has just laid before you. I can testify that every word he has spoken is true, even to the advancement of the Saints at a "snail gallop." Though that is rather a novel expression, still it is true, as well as all the rest which he advanced.
                The items that have been advanced are principles of real doctrine, whether you consider them so or not. It is one of the first principles of the doctrine of salvation to become acquainted with our Father and our God. The Scriptures teach that this is eternal life, to "know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent;" this is as much as to say that no man can enjoy or be prepared for eternal life without that knowledge.
                You hear a great deal of preaching upon this subject; and when people repent of their sins, they will get together, and pray and exhort each other, and try to get the spirit of revelation, try to have God their Father revealed to them, that they may know Him and become acquainted with Him.
                There are some plain, simple facts that I wish to tell you, and I have but one desire in this, which is, that you should have understanding to receive them, to treasure them up inyour hearts, to contemplate upon these facts, for they are simple facts, based upon natural principles; there is no mystery about them when once understood.
                I want to tell you, each and every one of you, that you are well acquainted with God our heavenly Father, or the great Eloheim. You are all well acquainted with Him, for there is not a soul of you but what has lived in His house and dwelt with Him year after year; and yet you are seeking to become acquainted with Him, when the fact is, you have merely forgotten what you did know. I told you a little last Sabbath about forgetting things.
                There is not a person here to-day but what is a son or a daughter of that Being. In the spirit world their spirits were first begotten and brought forth, and they lived there with their parents for ages before they came here. This, perhaps, is hard for many to believe, but it is the greatest nonsense in the world not to believe it. If you do not believe it, cease to call Him Father; and when you pray, pray to some other character. It would be inconsistent in you to disbelieve what I think you know, and then to go home and ask the Father to do so and so for you. The Scriptures which we believe have taught us from the beginning to call Him our Father, and we have been taught to pray to Him as our Father, in the name of our eldest brother whom we call Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the world; and that Saviour, while here on earth, was so explicit on this point, that he taught his disciples to call no man on earth father, for we have one which is in heaven. He is the Saviour, because it is his right to redeem the remainder of the family pertaining to the flesh on this earth, if any of you do not believe this, tell us how and what we should believe. If I am not telling you the truth, please to tell me the truth on this subject, and let me know more than I do know. If it is hard for you to believe, if you wish to be Latter-day Saints, admit the fact as I state it, and do not contend against it. Try to believe it, because you will never become acquainted with our Father, never enjoy the blessings of His Spirit, never be prepared to enter into His presence, until you most assuredly believe it; therefore you had better try to believe this great mystery about God.
                I do not marvel that the world is clad in mystery, to them He is an unknown God; they cannot tell where He dwells nor how He lives, nor what kind of a being He is in appearance or character. They want to become acquainted with His character and attributes, but they know nothing of them. This is in consequence of the apostacy that is now in the world. They have departed from the knowledge of God, transgressed His laws, changed His ordinances, and broken the everlasting covenant, so that the whole earth is defiled under the inhabitants thereof. Consequently it is no mystery to us that the world knoweth not God, but it would be a mystery to me, with what I now know, to say; that we cannot know anything of Him. We are His children.
                To bring the truth of this matter close before you, I will instance your fathers who made the first permanent settlement in New England. There are a good many in this congregation whose fathers landed upon Plymouth Rock in the year 1620. Those fathers began to spread abroad; they had children, those children had children, and their children had children, and here are we their children. I am one of them, and many of this congregation belong to that class. Now ask yourselves this simple question upon natural principles, has the species altered? Were not the people who landed at Plymouth Rock the same species with us? Were they not organized as we are? Were not their countenances similar to ours? Did they not converse, have knowledge, read books? Were there not mechanics among them, and did they not understand agriculture, &c. as we do? Yes, every person admits this.
                Now follow our fathers further back and take those who first came to the island of Great Britain, were they the same species of beings as those who came to America? Yes, all acknowledge this; this is upon natural principles. Thus you may continue and trace the human family back to Adam and Eve, and ask, "are we of the same species with Adam and Eve?" Yes, every person acknowledges this; this comes within the scope of our understanding.
                But when we arrive at that point, a vail is dropt, and our knowledge is cut off. Were it not so, you could trace back your history to the Father of our spirits in the eternal world. He is a being of the same species as ourselves; He lives as we do, except the difference that we are earthly, and He is heavenly. He has been earthly, and is of precisely the same species of being that we are. Whether Adam is the personage that we should consider our heavenly Father, or not, is considerable of a mystery to a good many. I do not care for one moment how that is; it is no matter whether we are to consider Him our God, or whether His Father, or His Grandfather, for in either case we are of one speciesof one familyand Jesus Christ is also of our species.
                You may hear the divines of the day extol the character of the Saviour, undertake to exhibit his true character before the people, and give an account of his origin, and were it not ridiculous, I would tell what I have thought about their views. Brother Kimball wants me to tell it, therefore you will excuse me if I do. I have frequently thought of mules, which you know are half horse and half ass, when reflecting upon the representations made by those divines. I have heard sectarian priests undertake to tell the character of the Son of God, and they make him half of one species and half of another, and I could not avoid thinking at once of the mule, which is the most hateful creature that ever was made, I believe. You will excuse me, but I have thus thought many a time.
                Now to the facts in the case; all the difference between Jesus Christ and any other man that ever lived on the earth, from the days of Adam until now, is simply this, the Father, after He had once been in the flesh, and lived as we live, obtained His exaltation, attained to thrones, gained the ascendancy ever principalities and powers, and had the knowledge and power to createto bring forth and organize the elements upon natural principles. This He did after His ascension, or His glory, or His eternity, and was actually classed with the Gods, with the beings who create, with those who have kept the celestial law while in the flesh, and again obtained their bodies. Then He was prepared to commence the work of creation, as the Scriptures teach. It is all here in the Bible; I am not telling you a word but what is contained in that book.
                Things were first created spiritually; the Father actually begat the spirits, and they were brought forth and lived with Him. Then He commenced the work of creating earthly tabernacles, precisely as He had been created in this flesh himself, by partaking of the course material that was organized and composed this earth, until His system was charged with it, consequently the tabernacles of His children were organized from the coarse materials of this earth.

                Комментарий

                • vladimir1
                  Участник

                  • 19 September 2004
                  • 262

                  #1313
                  When the time came that His first-born, the Saviour, should come into the world and take a tabernacle the Father came Himself and favoured that spirit with a tabernacle instead of letting any other man do it. The Saviour was begotten by the Father of His spirit, by the same Being who is the Father of our spirits, and that is all the organic difference between Jesus Christ and you and me. And a difference there is between our Father and us consists in that He has gained His exaltation, and has obtained eternal lives. The principle of eternal lives is an eternal existence, eternal duration, eternal exaltation. Endless are His kingdoms, endless His thrones and His dominions, and endless are His posterity; they never will cease to multiply from this time henceforth and forever.
                  To you who are prepared to enter into the presence of the Father and the Son, what I am now telling will eventually be no more strange than are the feelings of a person who returns to his father's house, brethren, and sisters, and enjoys the society of his old associates, after an absence of several years upon some distant island. Upon returning he would be happy to see his father, his relatives and friends. So also if we keep the celestial law when our spirits go to God who gave them, we shall find that we are acquainted there and distinctly realize that we know all about that world.
                  Tell me that you do not know anything about God! I will tell you one thing, it would better become you to lay your hands upon your mouths and them in the dust, and cry, "unclean, unclean."
                  Whether you receive these things or not, I tell you them in simplicity. I lay them before you like a child, bemuse they are perfectly simple. If you see and understand these things, it will be by the Spirit of God; you will receive them by no other spirit. No matter whether they are told to you like the thunderings of the Almighty, or by simple conversation; if you enjoy the Spirit of the Lord, it will tell you whether they are right or not.
                  I am acquainted with my Father. I am as confident that I understand in part, see in part, and know and am acquainted with Him in part, as I am that I was acquainted with my earthly father who died in Quincy, Illinois, after we were driven from Missouri. My recollection is better with regard to my earthly father than it is in regard to my heavenly Father; but as to knowing of what species He is, and how He is organized, and with regard to His existence, I understand it in part as well as I understand the organization and existence of my earthly father. That is my opinion about it, and my opinion to me is just as good as yours is to you; and if you are of the same opinion you will be satisfied as I am.
                  I know my heavenly Father and Jesus Christ whom He has sent, ariel this is eternal life. And if we will do as we have been told this morning, if you will enter into the Spirit of your calling, into the principle of securing to yourselves eternal lives, eternal existence, eternal exaltation, it will be well with you. But if, after being put into a carriage and placed upon the road, after having everything prepared for the journey that infinite wisdom could devise, this people stroll into the swamp, get into the woods among the brambles and briars, and wander around until night overtakes them, I say, shame on such people.
                  I am ashamed to talk about a reformation, for if you have entered into the spirit of your religion, you will know whether these things are so or not. If you have the spirit of your religion and have confidence in you, walk along and continue to do so, and secure to yourselves the life before you, and never let it be said, from this time henceforth, that you have wakened out of your sleep, from the fact that you are always awake.
                  We talk about the reformation, but recollect that you have only just commenced to walk in the way of life and salvation. You have just commenced in the career to obtain eternal life, which is that which you desire, therefore you have no time to spend only in that path. It is straight and narrow, simple and easy, and is an Almighty path, if you will keep in it. But if you wander off into swamps, or into brambles, and get into darkness, you will find it hard to get back.
                  Brother Cummings told you the truth this morning with regard to the sins of the people. And I will say that the time will come, and is now nigh at hand, when those who profess our faith, if they are guilty of what some of this people are guilty of, will find the axe laid at the root of the tree, and they will be hewn down. What has been must be again, for the Lord is coming to restore all things. The time has been in Israel under the law of God, the celestial law, or that which pertains to the celestial law, for it is one of the laws of that kingdom where our Father dwells, that if a man was found guilty of adultery, he must have his blood shed, and that is near at hand. But now I say, in the name of the Lord, that if this people will sin no more, but faithfully live their religion, their sins will be forgiven them without taking life.
                  You are aware that when brother Cummings came to the point of loving our neighbours as ourselves, he could say yes or no as the case might be, that is true. But I want to connect it with the doctrine you read in the Bible. When will we love our neighbour as ourselves? In the first place, Jesus said that no man hateth his own flesh. It is admitted by all that every person loves himself. Now if we do rightly love ourselves, we want to be saved and continue to exist, we want to go into the kingdom where we can enjoy eternity and see no more sorrow nor death. This is the desire of every person who believes in God. Now take a person in this congregation who has knowledge with regard to being saved in the kingdom of our God and our Father, and being exalted, one who knows and understands the principles of eternal life, and sees the beauty and excellency of the eternities before him compared with the vain and foolish things of the world, and suppose that he is overtaken in a gross fault, that he has committed a sin that he knows will deprive him of that exaltation which he desires, and that he cannot attain to it without the shedding of his blood, and also knows that by having his blood shed he will atone for that sin, and be saved and exalted with the Gods, is there a man or woman in this house but what would say, "shed my blood that I may be saved and exalted with the Gods?"
                  All mankind love themselves, and let these principles be known by an individual, and he would be glad to have his blood shed. That would be loving themselves, even unto an eternal exaltation. Will you love your brothers or sisters likewise, when they have committed a sin that cannot be atoned for without the sheding of their blood? Will you love that man or woman well enough to shed their blood? That is what Jesus Christ meant. He never told a man or woman to love their enemies in their wickedness, never. He never intended any such thing; his language is left as it is for those to read who have the Spirit to discern between truth and error; it was so left for those who can discern the things of God. Jesus Christ never meant that we should love a wicked man in his wickedness.
                  Now take the wicked, and I can refer to where the Lord had to slay every soul of the Israelites that went out of Egypt, except Caleb and Joshua. He slew them by the hands of their enemies, by the plague, and by the sword, why? Because He loved them, and promised Abraham that He would save them. And He loved Abraham because he was a friend to his God, and would stick to Him in the hour of darkness, hence He promised Abraham that He would save his seed. And He could save them upon no other principle, for they had forfeited their right to the land of Canaan by transgressing the law of God, and they could not have atoned for the sin if they had lived. But if they were slain, the Lord could bring them up in the resurrection, and give them the land of Canaan, and He could not do it on any other principle.
                  I could refer you to plenty of instances where men, have been righteously slain, in order to atone for their sins. I have seen scores and hundreds of people for whom there would have been a chance (in the last resurrection there will be) if their lives had been taken and their blood spilled on the ground as a smoking incense to the Almighty, but who are now angels to the devil, until our elder brother Jesus Christ raises them upconquers death, hell, and the grave. I have known a great many men who have left this Church for whom there is no chance whatever for exaltation, but if their blood had been spilled, it would have been better for them. The wickedness and ignorance of the nations forbid this principle's being in full force, but the time will come when the law of God will be in full force.
                  This is loving our neighbour as ourselves; if he needs help, help him; and if he wants salvation and it is necessary to spill his blood on the earth in order that he may be saved, spill it. Any of you who understand the principles of eternity, if you have sinned a sin requiring the shedding of blood, except the sin unto death, would not be satisfied nor rest until your blood should be spilled, that you might gain that salvation you desire. That is the way to love mankind.
                  Christ and Belial have not become friends; they have never shaken hands; they never have agreed to be brothers and to be on good terms; no, never; and they never will, because they are diametrically opposed to each other. If one conquers, the other is destroyed. One or the other of them must triumph and utterly destroy and cast down his opponent. Light and darkness cannot dwell together, and so it is with the kingdom of God,
                  Now, brethren and sisters, will you live your religion? How many hundreds of times have I asked you that question? Will the Latter-day Saints live their religion? I am ashamed to say anything about a reformation among Saints, but I am happy to think that the people called Latter-day Saints are striving now to obtain the Spirit of their calling and religion. They are just coming into the path, just waking up out of their sleep. It seems as though they are nearly all like babies; we are but children in one sense. Now let us begin, like children, and walk in the straight and narrow path, live our religion, and honour our God.
                  With these remarks, I pray the God of Israel to bless you forever and ever, for you are the best people on earth. I can say that I am happy that you are doing so well as you are. Continue to increase in all the graces of God's Spirit until the day of His coming, which I desire with all my heart, in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

                  Brigham Young Blood Atonement Sermon:
                  Journal of Discourses
                  Vol. 4, p. 215-221

                  Комментарий

                  • Evacska
                    Участник

                    • 27 November 2005
                    • 312

                    #1314
                    Молодец, Владимир, ищете, изучаете! Есть хорошее объяснение в мировой энциклопедии: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_atonement

                    Но, требуется много времени (хотя оно того и стоит) перечитать все, что написано пророками и лидерами. Это как примерно было при Коммунизме, горы книг, тонны материала. Чтение - это хорошо, но при этом нужен также обзор беспристрастным взглядом. Как врач в дур. доме, слушает больного, но понимает откуда тот, извлекает картинки. Материала очень много, нужно лишь время и язык (английский).
                    IGNORANCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY OPPRESSION.
                    IT ONLY MAKES IT POSSIBLE.
                    Patricia Evans Controlling People

                    Комментарий

                    • Evacska
                      Участник

                      • 27 November 2005
                      • 312

                      #1315
                      Сообщение от Evacska
                      Молодец, Владимир, ищете, изучаете! Есть хорошее объяснение в мировой энциклопедии: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_atonement

                      Но, требуется много времени (хотя оно того и стоит) перечитать все, что написано пророками и лидерами. Это как примерно было при Коммунизме, горы книг, тонны материала. Чтение - это хорошо, но при этом нужен также обзор беспристрастным взглядом. Как врач в дур. доме, слушает больного, но понимает откуда тот, извлекает картинки. Материала очень много, нужно лишь время и язык (английский).
                      Blood atonement

                      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


                      Jump to: navigation, search
                      In Mormonism, blood atonement is a controversial doctrine taught by some early Latter-day Saint leaders, and expanded by Brigham Young, that within a theocracy, there are certain sins such as murder that requires that murderers "have their blood spilt upon the ground, that the smoke thereof might ascend to heaven as an offering for their sins" in order for the Atonement of Jesus fully operative in the repentance process.
                      While criticized by many Mormons and eventually repudiated as official Church doctrine by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ("LDS Church") in 1978, this doctrine still has some adherents, and it is sometimes advanced by conservative Mormons to justify capital punishment, particularly in ways such as execution by firing squad that involved the actual and literal spilling of blood on the ground, which some Mormons believed was a requirement of the doctrine. The doctrine has been cited as a reason why Utah was one of the last three U.S. states to continue executions by firing squad (for those who chose it over lethal injection), although in 2004 Utah governor Olene Walker signed a bill outlawing execution by firing squad, and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints officially indicated no objection to this change. Provisions allow, however, for four individuals who had already chosen death by firing squad as their form of execution.
                      Some of Brigham Young's early critics suggested that this doctrine was responsible for inciting the murders of some early Latter-day Saint apostates, dissenters, and critics. While some early Latter-day Saint apostates, dissenters, and critics were murdered, it is generally considered there is no conclusive evidence linking such murders to blood atonement doctrine. In addition, no conclusive evidence exists that Brigham Young even tacitly sanctioned such behavior.
                      The blood atonement doctrine is often confused with the unrelated so-called "blood oaths" that were part of the Latter-day Saint Endowment ceremony prior to 1990 (see below).
                      IGNORANCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY OPPRESSION.
                      IT ONLY MAKES IT POSSIBLE.
                      Patricia Evans Controlling People

                      Комментарий

                      • RehNeferMes
                        Отключен

                        • 23 September 2005
                        • 6097

                        #1316
                        Ну, я ж именно эту речь Янга перевел и выложил целиком несколькими страницами ранее.

                        Что, хотели проверить, точен ли мой перевод? :d

                        Комментарий

                        • vladimir1
                          Участник

                          • 19 September 2004
                          • 262

                          #1317
                          Сообщение от RehNeferMes
                          Ну, я ж именно эту речь Янга перевел и выложил целиком несколькими страницами ранее.

                          Что, хотели проверить, точен ли мой перевод? :d
                          Вовсе нет.
                          Просто, Евачка, выхватывает цитаты, выдает их на гора, а смысл теряется.
                          Пусть народ читает. Спасибо за ваши переводы.
                          Я и ранее их читал и сейчас читаю.
                          Могу сказать, что на основании вашего перевода выступления , по моему, Бенсона, 14 принципов следования Пророку, я провел урок на кворуме Священства.
                          Интерсеный урок получился.
                          Спасибо, за ваш вклад в мормонизм.

                          Комментарий

                          • vladimir1
                            Участник

                            • 19 September 2004
                            • 262

                            #1318
                            Вот перевод выступления Бригама Янга сделанный RehNeferMes

                            To Know God is Eternal LifeGod the Father of Our Spirits and BodiesThings Created Spiritually FirstAtonement By the Shedding of Blood
                            A Discourse by President Brigham Young, Delivered in the Tabernacle, Great Salt Lake City, February 8, 1857.
                            Еще раз спасибо за ваш труд.



                            Комментарий

                            • vladimir1
                              Участник

                              • 19 September 2004
                              • 262

                              #1319
                              Сообщение от vladimir1
                              To Know God is Eternal LifeGod the Father of Our Spirits and BodiesThings Created Spiritually FirstAtonement By the Shedding of Blood
                              A Discourse by President Brigham Young, Delivered in the Tabernacle, Great Salt Lake City, February 8, 1857.



                              И вопрос по этой теме.
                              Цитата из статьи.

                              "....Каждый из вас, кто понимает принципы вечности, - если бы впал в грех, требующий искупления кровью, за исключением греха к смерти, то не знал бы ни мира ни покоя до тех пор, пока не пролилась бы ваша кровь, ибо только так вы бы могли достичь спасения, которого ищете...."

                              О каких грехах идет речь?
                              Какие грехи, кроме уже известного прелюбодения, требовали в Израиле искупление кровью?





                              Комментарий

                              • vladimir1
                                Участник

                                • 19 September 2004
                                • 262

                                #1320
                                Сообщение от Evacska
                                Молодец, Владимир, ищете, изучаете! Есть хорошее объяснение в мировой энциклопедии: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_atonement

                                Но, требуется много времени (хотя оно того и стоит) перечитать все, что написано пророками и лидерами. Это как примерно было при Коммунизме, горы книг, тонны материала. Чтение - это хорошо, но при этом нужен также обзор беспристрастным взглядом. Как врач в дур. доме, слушает больного, но понимает откуда тот, извлекает картинки. Материала очень много, нужно лишь время и язык (английский).
                                Спасибо за одобрение, Evacska.
                                Для беспристрасного взгляда как раз и необходимо не просто давать выхваченные цитаты, а либо саму статью или ссылку на нее, чтобы полностью иметь представление о том, что говорит автор.
                                Последний раз редактировалось vladimir1; 07 February 2006, 06:32 AM.

                                Комментарий

                                Обработка...