-
-
Последний раз редактировалось учащийся; 12 May 2021, 02:35 AM.... кто любит Меня, тот соблюдет слово Мое; и Отец Мой возлюбит его, и Мы придем к нему и обитель у него сотворим.
Межконфессиональный Христианский сайт и форум для желающих изучать БогословиеКомментарий
-
Комментарий
-
Комментарий
-
Комментарий
-
Есть у Ньютона и более прямые высказывания:
That the father Son & holy ghost are three distinct persons.
Или:
1. The {word} God is no where in the scriptures used to signify more then one of the thre persons at once.
2. The word God put absolutly without particular restriction to the Son or Holy ghost doth always signify the Father from one end of the scriptures to the other.
3. When ever it is said in the scriptures that there is but one God, it is meant of the Father
4. When, after some heretiques had taken Christ for a meare man & others for the Supreme God, Saint Iohn in his Gospel indeavoured to state his nature so that men might have from thence a right apprehension of him & avoyd those hæresies & to that end call him the word or λογος: we must suppose that {he inten}ded that {ter}me in the same sence that it was taken in the world before he used it when in like manner applied to an intelligent being. For if the Apostles had not used words as they found them how could they expect to have been rightly understood. Now the term λογος befor Saint Iohn wrote, was {generally} used in the sense of the Platonists, when applied to an intelligent being, & the Arrians understand it in the same sence, & therefore theirs is the true sense of Saint Iohn.
5. The son in several places confesseth his dependance on the will of the father.
6. The son confesseth the father greather then him calls him his God, &c
7 The Son acknowl{ed}g{e}th the original prescience of all future things to be in the father onely.
8 There is no where made mention of a humane soul in our saviour besides the word, by the mediation of which the word should be incarnate. But the word it self was made flesh & took upon him the {form} of a servant.
9. It was the son of God which he sent into the {world} & not a humane soul that suffered for us. If {there} had been such a human soul in our Savour it would havebee{n} a thing of too great consequence to have been wholly omitted by the Apostles.
10. It is a proper epithete of the father to be called almighty. For by God almighty we always understand the Father. yet this is not to limit the power of the Son, For he doth whatsoever he seeth the Father {do}, but to acknowledg that all power is originally in the Father & & that the son hath no power in him but what he derives from the father for he professes that of himself he can do nothing.
11 The son in all things submits his will to the will of the father. which would be unreasonable if he were equall to the father.
12 The union between him & the father he interprets to be like that of the saints one with another. That is in agreement of will & counsil.
Miscellaneous notes and extracts on the Temple, the Fathers, prophecy, Church history, doctrinal issues, etc.Комментарий
-
Конечно это просто умозрительный пример, позволяющий приблизительно оценить возможность чудес, в которые верят атеисты.
- - - Добавлено - - -
ну да,
а кто сказал, что молекулы воздуха в вашей комнате вдруг не совпадут в тепловых движениях и вдруг с первого раза не соберутся в одной её половине, а DrPepper вдруг не окажется в вакууме?
Комментарий
-
Если задавать заведомо невозможные условия - то конечно. То, что в результате перебора может образоваться другой белок, в расчет не берётся. Почему?Конечно это просто умозрительный пример, позволяющий приблизительно оценить возможность чудес, в которые верят атеисты.
- - - Добавлено - - -
ну да, а кто сказал, что молекулы воздуха в вашей комнате вдруг не совпадут в тепловых движениях и вдруг с первого раза не соберутся в одной её половине, а DrPepper вдруг не окажется в вакууме?
Почему именно последняя комбинация? Почему не пятнадцатая? А ведь время весьма сократится.Нет никаких богов..Комментарий
Твитнуть
Комментарий